The phrase identifies a query regarding the potential issuance of financial assistance to citizens under the Trump administration. Specifically, it probes the possibility of direct payments, often referred to as stimulus checks, being distributed to individuals. These payments are designed to stimulate economic activity during periods of recession or financial hardship. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, similar measures were implemented to provide financial relief to households and encourage spending.
The importance of understanding whether such measures are under consideration lies in their potential impact on personal finances and the overall economy. Stimulus checks can provide a temporary financial buffer for individuals facing unemployment or reduced income. Historically, the implementation of direct payments has been debated for its effectiveness in boosting consumer spending and driving economic growth. Evaluating the potential benefits and drawbacks is crucial for informed decision-making.
The following analysis will delve into the various factors that could influence the likelihood of such a policy being enacted. It will consider the economic climate, political considerations, and potential impacts on various segments of the population, while avoiding reliance on the specific search term itself.
1. Economic Conditions
Economic conditions serve as a primary determinant in evaluating the likelihood of government-issued stimulus payments. Deteriorating economic indicators often prompt consideration of fiscal interventions aimed at bolstering demand and mitigating hardship. The severity and nature of economic challenges directly correlate with the urgency and scale of potential stimulus measures.
-
Unemployment Rate
A significant rise in the unemployment rate signals widespread job losses and reduced household income. This scenario often leads to increased pressure on the government to provide financial assistance to unemployed individuals. Historically, substantial increases in unemployment have coincided with the implementation of stimulus programs to provide a safety net and encourage consumer spending.
-
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Growth
A decline in GDP growth, or an actual contraction, indicates a slowdown in economic activity. Negative or stagnant GDP growth raises concerns about recessionary pressures and prompts policymakers to consider measures to stimulate economic expansion. Stimulus payments are frequently considered as a tool to inject capital into the economy and encourage increased economic activity.
-
Inflation Rate
While high inflation may seemingly counter the need for stimulus, the type of inflation matters. If inflation is demand-driven and coupled with wage stagnation, targeted stimulus could be considered to alleviate pressure on low-income households. However, if inflation is primarily supply-side driven, stimulus measures may be less effective and could exacerbate inflationary pressures.
-
Consumer Confidence
Low consumer confidence reflects pessimism about the current and future economic outlook. This can lead to decreased spending and investment, further dampening economic activity. Stimulus payments can be viewed as a way to boost consumer confidence and encourage spending, thereby stimulating economic growth.
In summary, the convergence of adverse economic indicators, such as rising unemployment, declining GDP growth, specific types of inflation coupled with low wages, and depressed consumer confidence, strengthens the rationale for considering stimulus payments. The extent and design of such measures would be influenced by the specific nature and severity of the prevailing economic challenges. The specific context of such decision-making would occur within the prevailing political and budgetary realities of the time.
2. Presidential Authority
Presidential authority, in the context of potential stimulus payments, refers to the scope and limits of the executive branch’s power to initiate or influence the implementation of such measures. While the power to appropriate funds resides with Congress, the President possesses significant influence over the legislative agenda and the execution of fiscal policy.
-
Executive Influence on Legislation
The President can significantly influence the legislative process through various means, including direct communication with members of Congress, public endorsements of specific proposals, and the threat of veto. In the context of stimulus payments, the President’s support for a particular bill can increase its likelihood of passage. Conversely, Presidential opposition can effectively block a bill, even if it has broad support in Congress. For example, if the President publicly champions a specific stimulus package, it places pressure on legislators to consider and potentially support that proposal.
-
Emergency Powers
Under certain emergency conditions, such as a severe economic downturn or a national crisis, the President may invoke specific emergency powers granted by law. These powers can potentially expedite the implementation of certain economic relief measures. However, the scope of these powers is often subject to legal interpretation and judicial review, limiting the extent to which the President can act unilaterally. An example would be declaring a national emergency to unlock specific funds or expedite regulatory processes related to economic relief, though this remains a controversial and legally complex route.
-
Executive Orders and Memoranda
While the President cannot directly appropriate funds through executive orders, they can use these tools to direct executive branch agencies to implement policies that support economic relief. For instance, an executive order could direct agencies to streamline the distribution of existing benefits or to temporarily suspend certain regulations to ease the burden on businesses. However, the impact of executive orders on the distribution of stimulus payments is limited, as they cannot circumvent the need for Congressional authorization of funds. Consider, as an example, a presidential directive ordering agencies to prioritize the processing of unemployment claims or to provide temporary waivers for small business loan requirements.
-
Negotiating Power
The President serves as the chief negotiator for the executive branch in discussions with Congress regarding fiscal policy. The President’s ability to negotiate effectively with Congressional leaders can significantly impact the outcome of stimulus-related legislation. Successful negotiation can lead to compromise and the passage of a bill that addresses the needs of both the executive and legislative branches. For instance, the President might negotiate specific provisions of a stimulus bill, such as the size of the payments or the eligibility criteria, in exchange for Congressional support on other legislative priorities.
In conclusion, while the President cannot unilaterally authorize stimulus payments, their authority and influence play a crucial role in shaping the legislative agenda, negotiating with Congress, and implementing related policies. The President’s stance on stimulus measures, along with their ability to navigate the political landscape, significantly impacts the likelihood and nature of any potential economic relief package. The actual enactment of direct payments still requires the cooperation of the Legislative branch.
3. Congressional Support
Congressional support constitutes a critical determinant regarding the feasibility of any federal stimulus payment. The legislative branch holds the power of the purse, necessitating its approval for the allocation of funds required for direct payments to citizens. Without bipartisan or, at minimum, majority support in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, the implementation of stimulus checks is improbable.
-
Party Alignment and Legislative Priorities
The political composition of Congress significantly shapes the likelihood of stimulus approval. If the President’s party holds a majority in both chambers, securing passage is generally easier, assuming internal party consensus. However, divided government, where different parties control the executive and legislative branches, often leads to gridlock. Congressional support hinges on aligning stimulus proposals with the legislative priorities of the majority party or achieving bipartisan compromise. For example, if the prevailing congressional agenda prioritizes deficit reduction, securing approval for a large stimulus package becomes considerably more challenging, irrespective of the President’s stance.
-
Committee Influence
Specific congressional committees, such as the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee, wield significant influence over fiscal policy. These committees are responsible for drafting and reviewing legislation related to taxation and spending. Securing the support of key committee members and navigating the committee process is essential for advancing any stimulus proposal. A negative assessment or lack of support from these committees can effectively derail a stimulus bill. For example, if the chair of the Senate Finance Committee expresses reservations about the economic impact or budgetary implications of a stimulus proposal, it can significantly undermine its prospects for passage.
-
Ideological Divisions
Ideological divisions within Congress, particularly regarding the role of government in the economy, can significantly impede the passage of stimulus legislation. Differing perspectives on fiscal responsibility, the appropriate size and scope of government intervention, and the effectiveness of direct payments often lead to contentious debates and legislative gridlock. For example, some members of Congress may argue that stimulus checks are a wasteful and inefficient use of taxpayer money, while others may advocate for more targeted assistance to specific vulnerable populations. These ideological differences must be bridged through compromise or overcome through sheer majority vote to secure congressional approval.
-
Electoral Considerations
Electoral considerations often influence congressional decisions regarding stimulus payments. Members of Congress are responsive to the needs and concerns of their constituents, and the perceived popularity of stimulus measures can impact their voting behavior. If stimulus checks are widely supported by voters, members of Congress may be more inclined to support them, even if they have reservations about the policy. Conversely, if stimulus payments are unpopular or perceived as politically risky, members of Congress may be hesitant to support them, especially in the lead-up to an election. For example, a member of Congress representing a district with a high unemployment rate may be more likely to support stimulus checks to provide relief to struggling families and boost the local economy.
In essence, congressional support is a multifaceted element influenced by party dynamics, committee influence, ideological divides, and electoral considerations. These factors collectively determine the congressional response and thereby directly affect the probability of realizing “is trump sending us a stimulus check.” The absence of significant Congressional backing renders the potential for direct payments largely theoretical, irrespective of executive desire.
4. Budgetary Constraints
Budgetary constraints represent a critical factor in determining the feasibility of stimulus payments. The availability of federal funds, existing debt levels, and competing spending priorities significantly influence the likelihood of enacting such measures. Allocating resources for direct payments necessitates careful consideration of the trade-offs involved and the potential impact on the national debt.
-
National Debt and Deficit Levels
High national debt and persistent budget deficits constrain the government’s ability to implement new spending programs, including stimulus checks. Lawmakers must weigh the potential economic benefits of stimulus against the risks of further increasing the national debt. For example, if the national debt is already at historically high levels, Congress may be hesitant to approve a large stimulus package due to concerns about long-term fiscal sustainability. Increasing the debt ceiling may be required, a process that can itself be politically contentious.
-
Competing Spending Priorities
The federal budget encompasses a wide range of mandatory and discretionary spending programs. Allocating funds for stimulus payments requires diverting resources from other potentially valuable initiatives, such as defense, education, or infrastructure. Policymakers must carefully evaluate the relative priorities of different spending programs and make difficult choices about how to allocate limited resources. For instance, during a time of heightened national security concerns, lawmakers may prioritize defense spending over stimulus payments, even if there is a need for economic relief.
-
Mandatory vs. Discretionary Spending
A significant portion of the federal budget consists of mandatory spending programs, such as Social Security and Medicare, which are required by law. These programs are often politically sensitive and difficult to cut. As a result, any significant increase in spending on stimulus payments may require cuts to discretionary spending programs, which are subject to annual appropriations. This can lead to political battles over which programs should be reduced to make room for stimulus spending. For example, proposed cuts to environmental protection or scientific research to fund stimulus checks would likely generate significant opposition.
-
Economic Projections and Revenue Forecasts
Government revenue is highly dependent on the health of the economy. Economic downturns typically lead to lower tax revenues, which can further constrain the government’s ability to fund stimulus payments. Policymakers rely on economic projections and revenue forecasts to estimate the potential budgetary impact of stimulus measures. If the economic outlook is uncertain or if revenue forecasts are weak, lawmakers may be more cautious about approving large-scale stimulus packages. For example, if economists predict a prolonged recession and declining tax revenues, Congress may be reluctant to commit to substantial stimulus spending.
These budgetary elements directly affect the probability of the scenario, whether “is trump sending us a stimulus check” occurring. Strict fiscal conditions, high debt, and limited revenue streams inherently decrease the feasibility of such payments. A favorable budget situation, in contrast, enhances the potential for implementing stimulus measures, contingent upon other prevailing factors.
5. Policy Priorities
Policy priorities exert a substantial influence on the likelihood of stimulus payments. The administration’s overarching objectives and the relative importance it assigns to economic stimulus versus other goals shape its approach to fiscal policy. Alignment between proposed stimulus measures and the administration’s broader agenda increases the probability of their implementation.
-
Economic Growth Strategies
An administration prioritizing rapid economic growth may view stimulus payments as a viable tool to boost consumer spending and stimulate demand. If direct payments are perceived as a catalyst for accelerated economic expansion, they are more likely to be considered. Conversely, if the administration favors supply-side policies, such as tax cuts for businesses, stimulus checks may be deemed less effective or even counterproductive. For example, an administration focused on deregulation and corporate tax reductions may prioritize these measures over direct financial assistance to individuals, even during an economic downturn. The perceived connection between “is trump sending us a stimulus check” and larger strategies influence actual action.
-
Social Welfare Programs
The administration’s stance on social welfare programs significantly impacts the probability of stimulus payments. If the administration supports robust social safety nets, it may be more inclined to use stimulus checks as a means of providing temporary relief to vulnerable populations during economic hardship. However, if the administration favors reducing government involvement in social welfare, it may be less receptive to such measures. Consider an administration advocating for stricter eligibility requirements for social programs; they may be less inclined to support broad-based stimulus payments, preferring more targeted assistance or reduced government spending overall. The extent to which these programs are valued affects “is trump sending us a stimulus check.”
-
Fiscal Conservatism
The degree of fiscal conservatism within the administration plays a crucial role. An administration committed to fiscal responsibility and reducing the national debt may be hesitant to support large-scale stimulus payments, viewing them as fiscally irresponsible. Conversely, an administration less concerned about the national debt may be more willing to consider stimulus measures, especially during an economic crisis. For example, an administration prioritizing balanced budgets and debt reduction may seek to offset any new spending on stimulus payments with cuts to other programs or tax increases, thereby reducing the overall fiscal impact. The degree of fiscal concerns affects is trump sending us a stimulus check.
-
Political Considerations
Political considerations often weigh heavily on policy decisions. An administration facing an upcoming election may view stimulus payments as a way to boost its popularity and improve its electoral prospects. Conversely, an administration may be hesitant to implement stimulus measures if it believes they will be politically unpopular or ineffective. For instance, an administration might consider stimulus payments primarily to bolster its approval ratings among key voting blocs, even if there are concerns about the economic impact. Political benefits can affect if “is trump sending us a stimulus check” is asked.
These policy facets reflect the overall impact of executive priorities on “is trump sending us a stimulus check.” An approach emphasizing economic stimulus and welfare along with a disregard for long term concerns will greatly affect the possibility. In contrast, commitment to long-term conservative fiscal responsibilities likely will have a negative effect on the possibility of those payments being sent.
6. Political Climate
The prevailing political climate significantly influences the likelihood of stimulus payments. Partisan divisions, the level of cooperation between the executive and legislative branches, and the overall public mood shape the feasibility of enacting such measures. A highly polarized environment characterized by gridlock and distrust reduces the probability of bipartisan agreement on stimulus legislation. Conversely, a period of relative unity and cooperation can facilitate the passage of economic relief measures. The specific political dynamics in play at the time critically determine whether a proposal gains traction.
Consider, for example, the political climate during the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, a sense of national crisis fostered bipartisan support for stimulus packages aimed at mitigating the economic fallout. However, as the pandemic persisted, partisan divisions reemerged, leading to protracted negotiations over subsequent relief measures. Disagreements over the size and scope of the stimulus, as well as ideological differences regarding the role of government, hampered efforts to provide additional economic support. Furthermore, the timing of elections can exert significant influence. Legislators may be more inclined to support stimulus measures in the lead-up to an election to appeal to voters, but this can also lead to accusations of political opportunism. The practical significance lies in understanding that even economically sound proposals can be sidelined or significantly altered due to political considerations. “Is trump sending us a stimulus check” depends on a specific political climate that will allow it to happen or the political climate will make the possibility impossible.
In summary, the political climate serves as a critical filter through which stimulus proposals must pass. Partisan dynamics, legislative cooperation, and public sentiment collectively shape the fate of such measures. The inherent challenges of navigating a complex and often divided political landscape underscore the need for effective leadership, compromise, and a willingness to prioritize the common good. The understanding highlights the precarious nature of relying solely on economic need to predict the likelihood of direct payments; political realities frequently supersede purely economic rationales.
7. Public Opinion
Public opinion serves as a pivotal influence on the likelihood of any governmental action, including the distribution of stimulus checks. Mass sentiment, gauged through polls, surveys, and other forms of public discourse, can significantly impact legislative decisions and executive actions. Strong public support for stimulus measures can create political pressure on elected officials to act, while widespread opposition can effectively derail such proposals. The perceived legitimacy and desirability of stimulus checks are therefore directly linked to prevailing public attitudes. This connection operates on a cause-and-effect basis; heightened economic anxieties often fuel public demand for government intervention, including direct financial assistance. For example, during periods of high unemployment, public pressure for stimulus measures tends to increase, prompting policymakers to consider such actions.
The importance of public opinion stems from its ability to shape the political calculus of elected officials. Policymakers are often sensitive to public sentiment, particularly in the lead-up to elections. Supporting popular policies can enhance their electoral prospects, while opposing them can lead to political repercussions. The practical significance of understanding this dynamic lies in recognizing that public opinion can be strategically influenced through public awareness campaigns, advocacy efforts, and media coverage. For instance, if advocacy groups successfully frame stimulus checks as a vital lifeline for struggling families, they can sway public opinion and increase the likelihood of government action. Conversely, opponents can undermine public support by highlighting potential drawbacks, such as increased national debt or inflationary pressures. Examples of this dynamic can be seen in the framing of previous stimulus packages, where proponents emphasized the economic benefits and opponents focused on the potential costs. Understanding that “is trump sending us a stimulus check” can be shaped by opinion is crucial.
In conclusion, public opinion forms a crucial component of the complex equation that determines the feasibility of stimulus checks. Its influence operates through various channels, including political pressure, electoral considerations, and the shaping of policy debates. A comprehensive understanding of this dynamic requires recognizing that public opinion is not static but rather a fluid and evolving force that can be influenced by various factors. Recognizing challenges such as overcoming entrenched partisan views or misinformation campaigns is critical for effective advocacy or opposition to proposed policies. The linkage to the broader theme highlights the inherent interconnectedness of economic policy, political considerations, and societal values.
8. Historical Precedent
Historical precedent offers a crucial lens through which to evaluate the likelihood of future stimulus payments. Examining past instances of government-issued economic relief provides valuable insights into the factors that typically prompt such interventions, the design of stimulus measures, and their potential economic and political consequences. The frequency, scale, and characteristics of prior stimulus efforts can serve as indicators of the conditions under which similar actions might be considered.
-
The Great Depression and the New Deal
The economic crisis of the Great Depression led to the implementation of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, a series of programs and policies designed to alleviate poverty, stimulate economic recovery, and reform the financial system. Direct relief payments to individuals were a component of the New Deal, aimed at providing a safety net for the unemployed and boosting consumer demand. The scale of government intervention during the Great Depression, including direct payments, established a precedent for federal involvement in addressing severe economic downturns. In the context of evaluating “is trump sending us a stimulus check,” the New Deal provides a historical example of large-scale government intervention during times of economic crisis, suggesting that similar measures may be considered when facing comparable challenges.
-
The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008
In response to the 2008 financial crisis, the U.S. government enacted the Economic Stimulus Act, which included tax rebates for individuals and businesses. The goal of the stimulus package was to encourage spending and investment, thereby mitigating the impact of the recession. The 2008 stimulus provides a more recent precedent for direct payments to individuals as a tool for economic stabilization. Analyzing the effectiveness and impact of the 2008 stimulus can inform the design and implementation of potential future stimulus measures, offering insights into the optimal size, targeting, and timing of such payments. If considering “is trump sending us a stimulus check,” the 2008 Act provides a clear example of the government using this approach to resolve an economic crisis, with the pros and cons being part of the discussion.
-
Tax Rebates Under President George W. Bush
Prior to the 2008 stimulus, the Bush administration also implemented tax rebates as a means of stimulating the economy. These rebates were intended to boost consumer spending and provide a temporary economic boost. Studying the impact of these earlier tax rebates can provide additional data points for evaluating the effectiveness of direct payments as a stimulus tool. Comparing the outcomes of different stimulus efforts under different administrations and economic conditions can help policymakers refine their approach to economic stabilization. This helps provide context for “is trump sending us a stimulus check” because it displays that many administrations have used this tool for helping the economy.
-
COVID-19 Pandemic Relief Measures
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a series of unprecedented government interventions, including multiple rounds of stimulus checks to individuals and families. These payments were designed to provide financial relief to those affected by job losses, business closures, and other economic disruptions. The scale and scope of the COVID-19 relief measures represent a significant departure from previous stimulus efforts, reflecting the severity of the crisis and the urgent need for economic support. Examining the impact of the COVID-19 stimulus checks can provide valuable lessons for future economic crises, informing decisions about the appropriate level of government intervention and the most effective ways to deliver assistance to those in need. For example, analyzing the distribution methods and eligibility criteria used during the pandemic can help streamline the process for future stimulus efforts. Having previous examples helps influence, “is trump sending us a stimulus check” because there is evidence of previous solutions to lean on.
The examination of historical precedents reveals that the decision to issue stimulus payments is often driven by a combination of economic necessity, political considerations, and the perceived effectiveness of such measures. Analyzing past stimulus efforts can provide valuable insights into the potential benefits and drawbacks of direct payments, informing decisions about whether and how to implement similar measures in the future. Understanding prior strategies will help with addressing “is trump sending us a stimulus check” because they can learn from their prior mistakes.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Potential Stimulus Payments
This section addresses common inquiries and concerns surrounding the possibility of future stimulus payments, providing factual information to clarify understanding.
Question 1: What economic conditions typically warrant consideration of stimulus checks?
Stimulus checks are generally considered when there is a significant economic downturn, characterized by high unemployment, declining GDP growth, and low consumer confidence. A combination of these factors can prompt policymakers to consider fiscal interventions.
Question 2: What role does the President play in the distribution of stimulus checks?
While the President cannot unilaterally authorize stimulus payments, the President significantly influences the legislative agenda and negotiates with Congress regarding fiscal policy. The President’s support for a stimulus bill can increase its likelihood of passage.
Question 3: How does Congress influence the likelihood of stimulus payments?
Congress holds the power to appropriate funds, necessitating its approval for stimulus payments. Bipartisan or majority support in both the House and Senate is essential for the implementation of stimulus checks.
Question 4: How do budgetary constraints affect the feasibility of stimulus checks?
High national debt, budget deficits, and competing spending priorities can constrain the government’s ability to implement stimulus payments. Policymakers must weigh the economic benefits against the potential risks of increasing the national debt.
Question 5: Do policy priorities influence the likelihood of receiving stimulus checks?
Yes. The administration’s overarching objectives and the importance it assigns to economic stimulus versus other goals shape its approach to fiscal policy. Alignment between proposed stimulus measures and the administration’s broader agenda increases the probability of their implementation.
Question 6: How does public opinion affect decisions related to stimulus checks?
Public opinion significantly impacts legislative decisions and executive actions. Strong public support for stimulus measures can create political pressure on elected officials to act, while widespread opposition can effectively derail such proposals.
In summary, multiple factors affect the possibility of stimulus payments. These factors include economic conditions, and the support for economic stimulus payments from The President and the Legislative Branch. The factors also include the United State’s financial situation, its policy priorities, and what the public wants.
This leads us into a summary of the key components we have addressed in this article.
Navigating the Uncertainty of Potential Economic Relief
The following points offer guidance in assessing the possibility of direct government payments. These points are derived from considering multiple factors that affect such decisions.
Tip 1: Monitor Key Economic Indicators: Regularly review reports on unemployment rates, GDP growth, inflation, and consumer confidence indices. These indicators provide insight into the overall health of the economy and the potential need for government intervention. An example would be paying attention to the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports on a monthly basis.
Tip 2: Track Legislative Developments: Follow legislative news and monitor the progress of any bills related to economic stimulus or relief. Pay attention to committee hearings, floor debates, and voting records to gauge the level of support for such measures. Tracking services like GovTrack.us can be valuable.
Tip 3: Assess the Political Climate: Analyze the prevailing political dynamics, including the relationship between the executive and legislative branches, partisan divisions, and public sentiment. Understanding the political feasibility of stimulus measures is crucial. Monitoring reputable news sources and political analysis sites is key.
Tip 4: Evaluate Fiscal Considerations: Consider the budgetary constraints facing the government, including the national debt, deficit levels, and competing spending priorities. Understanding these limitations provides a realistic perspective on the potential for large-scale stimulus packages. Consult reports from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) for insights into federal budget projections.
Tip 5: Stay Informed About Policy Proposals: Remain aware of specific policy proposals related to economic stimulus, including the size and scope of potential payments, eligibility criteria, and distribution methods. This allows for an informed assessment of the potential impact on individual finances and the broader economy. Review official government websites and policy briefs from reputable think tanks.
Tip 6: Consult Financial Professionals: Seek advice from qualified financial advisors regarding strategies for managing personal finances in the face of economic uncertainty. They can provide tailored guidance based on individual circumstances. Consider consulting a Certified Financial Planner (CFP).
These points offer a framework for informed assessment. They emphasize the importance of monitoring various factors that could potentially influence the implementation of such initiatives.
The next section will present a final summary to consolidate the findings within this analysis.
Is Trump Sending Us a Stimulus Check
The inquiry “is trump sending us a stimulus check” necessitates an examination of multiple factors, including economic conditions, presidential authority, congressional support, budgetary constraints, policy priorities, the political climate, public opinion, and historical precedent. A definitive answer remains elusive, contingent upon the interplay of these dynamic variables. Assessing the likelihood of such an event requires ongoing monitoring of these factors and a nuanced understanding of their potential influence.
The subject of potential economic relief warrants continued attention and critical analysis. The complex interplay of economic, political, and social forces shapes the feasibility of such measures. Citizens should remain informed and engage in constructive dialogue to ensure that any policy decisions reflect the best interests of the nation. The factors presented here must be evaluated to give a well-informed answer to whether “is trump sending us a stimulus check.”
