The phrase describes a situation where members of the highest court in the United States are acting with caution and deliberation due to an impending conflict or disagreement with the former president. This circumspect behavior suggests an awareness of potential repercussions stemming from decisions or actions that might contradict the interests or expressed opinions of the former chief executive.
The significance of this situation lies in the Supreme Court’s role as a check on executive power and the need to maintain its independence and legitimacy. Historically, tensions have arisen between the judicial and executive branches, but instances where justices feel compelled to “tread carefully” highlight the extraordinary nature of the dynamic. This careful navigation is vital to protect the court’s institutional integrity and the public’s perception of its impartiality.
