The phrase refers to instances, either real or alleged, where specific terminology was discouraged or prohibited from use within governmental agencies or communications during the administration of former President Donald Trump. Such restrictions could stem from a desire to alter the perception of certain issues, streamline messaging, or reflect evolving policy priorities. For example, reports surfaced indicating that terms related to climate change were discouraged in favor of alternative phrasing.
The significance of such lists lies in their potential to influence public discourse and policy decisions. Restricting particular vocabulary can shape how government employees, the media, and the public understand and address crucial issues. The historical context is rooted in the broader understanding of how language is used as a tool to frame narratives and influence public opinion, a practice that has been employed by governments and institutions throughout history.
