The phrase describes a situation where a public figure, specifically referring to Donald Trump in this context, experiences a minor setback or criticism (“grazed”) but remains seemingly unaffected and unperturbed (“unfazed”). It implies a resilience or perceived immunity to negative impacts that would typically affect others. For example, even after facing significant public scrutiny, the individual continues to operate and communicate with apparent confidence and without significant alteration to their behavior.
The perceived ability to withstand criticism and controversy holds significant sway within certain segments of the population. This perceived resilience can be interpreted as strength or conviction, reinforcing existing support. Historically, figures who project unwavering certainty, even in the face of adversity, have often cultivated loyal followings. This characteristic can be strategically employed to maintain influence and control the narrative surrounding events.
