NEPA Under Trump: Environmental Review Changes & Impacts

trump administration nepa environmental review

NEPA Under Trump: Environmental Review Changes & Impacts

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) mandates federal agencies to assess the environmental impacts of proposed major actions. During the period from 2017 to 2021, the executive branch implemented several revisions to the regulations governing this process. These modifications altered the scope and depth of analysis required for infrastructure projects, resource management decisions, and other federal undertakings. For example, specific changes concerned the definition of “major federal action” and the extent to which indirect and cumulative effects needed to be considered.

These regulatory adjustments aimed to streamline project approvals and reduce perceived bureaucratic obstacles. Proponents argued that the changes would accelerate economic development and infrastructure modernization by shortening the time required for environmental assessments. Detractors, however, expressed concern that the revised rules could weaken environmental safeguards and limit public input in decision-making processes, potentially leading to adverse ecological consequences and diminished transparency.

Read more

6+ NEPA Changes: Project Developer Uncertainty After Trump

trump's changes to nepa create uncertainty for project developers

6+ NEPA Changes: Project Developer Uncertainty After Trump

Revisions to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) during the Trump administration altered the environmental review process for proposed federal projects. These modifications included narrowing the scope of projects subject to review, setting stricter time limits for environmental impact statements, and limiting the consideration of cumulative environmental impacts. The practical effect of these adjustments has been perceived differently by various stakeholders.

Proponents of the changes argued that streamlining the NEPA process would accelerate infrastructure development and economic growth, reducing regulatory burdens and project delays. Conversely, concerns were raised that the revised regulations could lead to inadequate environmental oversight, potentially resulting in greater environmental harm and insufficient consideration of community impacts. The historical context of NEPA demonstrates a long-standing tension between environmental protection and development interests.

Read more