The phrase describes a situation where one person, specifically Donald Trump, publicly and decisively abandons or undermines another person, Marco Rubio, typically for personal or political gain. This action involves sacrificing Rubio’s interests or reputation to advance Trump’s own agenda. For example, Trump might publicly criticize Rubio’s policy positions, even if he previously supported them, to appeal to a different voting base or to diminish Rubio’s political standing.
This type of political maneuver is significant because it reveals strategic calculations and shifting alliances within a competitive environment. The benefits, if any, are primarily accrued to the individual initiating the action, who may gain increased popularity, influence, or a stronger position within a political party. Historically, such actions have been used to consolidate power, eliminate rivals, or realign political landscapes. They often reflect a pragmatic, and sometimes ruthless, approach to achieving specific political objectives.